The medical power of hypnosis

BBC
20-05-2022
Source hyperlink

The medical power of hypnosis

Summary: Hypnosis, once regarded as a stage magician’s trick, is now emerging as a potent medical treatment. Dr. David Spiegel, a pioneer in clinical hypnosis, recounts an early encounter with a wheezing asthma patient. Through hypnosis, he eased her symptoms, sparking his lifelong interest in this field. Hypnotic suggestions can lead to profound experiences, such as being unable to recognize one’s own reflection. Research shows that hypnosis is effective for pain, anxiety, PTSD, irritable bowel syndrome, and more. It works by altering brain activity, increasing the neurotransmitter GABA, and inducing a trance-like state. Despite its eccentric history, hypnosis is gaining credibility as a valuable therapeutic tool1.

Key Points:

  1. Spiegel’s Encounter: Dr. Spiegel successfully treated an asthma patient using hypnosis, calming her wheezing and improving her breathing.
  2. Hypnotic Suggestions: Simple suggestions during hypnosis can lead to remarkable outcomes, such as involuntary arm movement or fused interlaced fingers.
  3. Effective Therapeutic Tool: Evidence supports hypnosis for pain management, anxiety, PTSD, and other conditions.
  4. Brain Changes: Hypnosis alters brain activity and increases GABA levels.
  5. Trance-Like State: Hypnotizable individuals enter a focused, receptive state during sessions.

In summary, hypnosis transcends its magical reputation, offering real benefits in modern medicine

Update on hypnotherapy for psychiatrists

BJPsych
07-09-2021
Source hyperlink

Update on hypnotherapy for psychiatrists

Summary: Although hypnosis has played a part in psychotherapy for a long time, it is not yet seen as an evidence-based therapy and is absent from many practice guidelines when it comes to the treatment of psychiatric disorders. At present, the applications and methods of hypnotherapy are poorly understood and other methods of psychotherapy tend to be favoured. This review article aims to introduce the role of hypnotherapy and its application for certain common psychiatric presentations, as well as examine its efficacy by summarising recent evidence from high-quality outcome studies and meta-analyses.

Nurse’s knowledge and perceptions on communicative hypnosis: an observational study

PubMed Central
29-07-2021
Source hyperlink

Nurse’s knowledge and perceptions on communicative hypnosis: an observational study

Abstract
Background and aim of the study.
Much evidence shows that hypnotic communication can have a pain-relieving effect and reduce complications such as anxiety, insomnia and depression. Whenever this technique was applied, the use of pharmaceuticals was reduced, there were fewer side effects, shorter hospitalization times frames and lower treatment costs. The aim of this study is to evaluate the knowledge and perceptions of nurses about hypnotic communication and the causes for which this technique is not frequently used. A secondary objective pointed to measuring the effectiveness of an educational event on hypnosis.

Method.
The evaluation was done by directly administering an anonymous and voluntary survey created ad hoc, in a pre-test and post-test modality, to nurses subscribed to a four-hour formative event on hypnotic communication organized in 2019 by the Nursing Order, Province of Ravenna.

Results.
78 nurses (85.7%) participated in the study. The analysis of the pre-test results shows a gap of knowledge regarding hypnotic communication. The variation of answers between the pre-test and post-test (T-Student) has shown a radical difference in knowledge (95%-100% correct answers). The main causes were found regarding the lack of use for hypnotic communication: stereotypes and prejudices related to this technique and insufficient university education.

Conclusions.
The implementation of this technique, effective and efficient under various aspects, requires a preliminary creation of culture regarding this theme, capable of surpassing the stereotypes and resistances brought by a lack of theoretical elements.

Go to:
Introduction
Neurophysiological studies have demonstrated that hypnosis is different from the effects brought by placebo and sleep (1). The use of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) demonstrated that during hypnosis there is an activation of the anterior cingulate cortex in the brain, capable of modifying the perceptions of a person as to reduce painful stimuli (2, 3). Computerized MRI scan has demonstrated that during a hypnotic state there is a substantial amount of activity in cortex region called DMN or Default Mode Network of the resting-state, present in awake subjects that lack awareness of their surrounding environment (4).

These studies have rekindled the interest towards various uses of this technique in clinical contexts and have allowed the acceptance and possible viability of this type of treatment by the medical-scientific community (5, 6).

Hypnotic communication uses persuasion and suggestions to surpass rational analysis and affects the subconscious, bypassing defenses and stimulating emotions. Hypnotic communication uses the strength that words have on a neurophysiological level and the bonds between operator and patient. Every experience in the world creates constraints that are in origin neurological (length of sound waves, visual chromatic spectrum), social (rules, language), individual (life experiences) and as such there is no objective reality (7).

This technique is used by doctors, psychiatrists and health workers all of which are specifically trained (8). As for indications regarding the use of these techniques in a medical field, hypnosis might be effective in:

– In reduction of pain for gastrointestinal disorders such as ulcers, irritable colon, colitis, crohn’s disease (9);
– In reduction for pain for dermatological disorders like eczema, herpes, neurodermatitis, itchiness, psoriasis, warts (10);
– In reduction of acute and chronic pain back aches, oncological pain, head aches and migraines, arthritis, rheumatism (11-15);
– In reduction of nausea and vomiting as symptoms caused by chemotherapy (16-20);
– In stabilizing hematic flow (21, 22);
– In handling anxiety in cases of acute respiratory events connected to allergies, in particular asthma (23);
– In reduction of hypertension and in invasive vascular procedures (24, 25);
– In reduction of pain connected to the replacement of medication on second degree burns and above (26,28);
– In surgery as an analgesic, especially in cases of allergic or hypersensitive patients or in cases of awake surgery (5, 18, 29,30);
– During childbirth as to reduce nausea caused by pregnancy (gestational hypermisis) (31);
– As an alternative to pharmaceutical anesthesia in dental contexts (32-34);
– In reduction of anxiety and pain connected to invasive procedures in ambulatory regimes (29-38);
– In reduction of anxiety, through the blocking of the sympathetic reactions caused by stress (16; 39-41);
– In reduction of anxiety and pain in a pediatric patient (42-48).
There are patients that are less effected by hypnosis. The results obtained are differentiated by suggestibility of the subject and the capability of the therapist. This means that 2 patients with different suggestibility and two therapists, with different levels of technique and communicative-relational skills, might produce very different results (49).

Even though there are various prejudices towards hypnotic communication, some Italian contexts have had for some time health care professionals-such as doctors and nurses- taught in the proper use of this technique, producing positive results. For example, at the Hospital “Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino” there have been specific courses regarding hypnotic communication and this technique has been used in thousands of procedures, from cardiac ablations to gastrointestinal endoscopy. The use of hypnotic communication in this case has provided positive results in clinical outcomes (such as the reduction of collateral effects connected to pharmaceuticals) and in economical outcome (lower waiting times and use of medicines) (50).

Go to:
Methods
Aim of the study
The purpose of this study is that of evaluate perspectives and knowledges of nurses regarding the theme of hypnotic communication as to ascertain the main gaps of awareness and the more usual stereotypes that limit the use of this technique within healthcare practices.

A secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a formative event on hypnotic communication with the purpose of changing preconceptions and gaps of knowledge for professionals.

Design
A descriptive cross-sectional survey was carried out.

Setting
To recruit registered nurses (RNs), we asked the participation of the Nursing Order (OPI) of Ravenna, because it had planned a four-hour training event about hypnotic communication. Data collection was done during the formative event “The Hypnotic Communication” available only to nurses and organized by the Nursing Order on the 9th march 2019.

Instrument
The survey was divided into a pre-test and a post-test. The questionnaire was made ad hoc by the researchers, in collaboration with the speaker of the training course, based on the topics covered during the formative event.

In the module pre-test there were 4 personal data variables (age, gender, work place, years of experience), 8 questions on the theme of hypnotic communication, the questions are multiple choice directed to evaluate theoretical know-how and two last items done to ascertain stereotypes and prejudices from the participants. Questions about prejudice were only asked in the pre-test because the formative event could influence responses. The module of the post-test had the same 8 theoretical questions and a new question regarding the dimension of preconceptions. The questions about perceptions were placed only in the post-test because the educational event was functional to the response.

Go to:
The questionnaire’s areas are indicated here below.
Stereotypes questions (pre-test only)

In your opinion, is a person in a state of hypnosis free to come out of it voluntarily?

In your opinion, from 0 to 10, how much of hypnosis is manipulation?

Go to:
Theoretical questions (pre and post-test)
Item 1 – What is hypnosis?

Item 2 – In what percentage of individuals can hypnotic analgesia be obtained for surgery?

Item 3 – What should a hypnotist do during a diagnostic-therapeutic procedure?

Item 4 – How quickly can a hypnotic induction be obtained?

Item 5 – Which subject is easiest to hypnotize?

Item 6 – What are the objective signs of an effective hypnotic trance?

Item 7 – What percentage of subjects are capable of all hypnotic abilities (e.g., analgesia, catalepsy)?

Item 8 – According to the legislation, who can practice hypnotic communication?

Go to:
Perception questions (post-test only)
Possible causes for lack of hypnosis communication in clinical practice (indicate three options):
Insufficient university education
Insufficient post-degree formation
Presence of stereotypes and prejudices
Risk of interprofessional conflicts
Complexity of the technique
Not much time during work
Few application contexts
Procedure
The pre-test was distributed before the start of the formative event, after a brief explanation on participation modalities and the compilation of informed consent. During the course, the technical, normative and formative characteristics of hypnotic communication the participants were given.

At the end, the post-test containing the same questions of the pre-test has been administered for evaluating the effectiveness of the formative event. The formative course was held a professional highly qualified on the subject, the President of A.S.I.E.C.I (Italian Scientific Association of Experienced Nurses in Hypnotic Communication). The 8 theoretical questions of the pre-test and post-test were agreed upon with the lecturer of the formative course

Sampling
The questionnaire was administered to all nurses enrolled in the educational event (n. 91); the non-probabilistic sample is composed from all the nurses that voluntarily agreed to participate (n.78).

Data analysis
Data was analyzed with the demo version of SPSS statistical software. Descriptive statistical analysies (frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, median) were performed with a 95% confidence interval. A Chi-square test was used for analyzing the nominal variables and an ANOVA test for the cardinal variables.

Ethical considerations
The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the University of Bologna (Prot.71554 del 29/3/2019). The instrument was completely anonymous and before releasing it an informative consent was signed by all the participants.

Go to:
Results
The sample size is of 78 nurses (85.7% of total participants at the formative event).71 were women (91%) and were 7 men (9%). the average age of the sample is 46 years old (±10.5) with an average workplace experience of 23 years (±12.2). Another variable included in the test is the specific area filled in the workplace by the subjects. From the results it’s shown that 16.7 % of the participants (n. 13) works in contexts of surgery or hospitalization, the 8.9% in the operating room and equal value in outpatient contexts. Few nurses worked within their territory (5.2%) or contexts like emergency, psychiatry and pediatric (3.8%). A smaller amount (2.6%) of participants worked in intensive care (Tab 1).

Analysis of competencies
Analysis of the results taken from the section regarding theoretical knowledge showed a marked difference between participants’ responses before and after the training event (pre-test and post-test). This trend is clear in all 8 items of the survey (Tab. 2).

For instance, in item 1, where the knowledge of nurses was polled regarding the physiology and in particular if it might be attributable to a state of physiological consciousness (right answer) or in some way altered, the variation of knowledge seems to be clear: from 40.3% in the pre-test to 100% in the post-test.

The variation of answers between the pre-test and post-test has shown a radical difference in knowledge (95%-100% correct answers) non only for item 1 but also the other 4 answers (Fig. 1).

At the moment when the necessary time of induction of the state of hypnosis was asked (item 4) only 6.5% answered correctly in the pre-test phase; namely that it happens in a few minutes. This changed in the post-test, where 67.1% answered correctly.

The connection between patient and a specialized operator in hypnotic communication was analyzed (item 3) and even in the pre-test a correct amount of sensibility was shown among operators which answered correctly 74% of the time, even before the formative event. Even though the type of connection analyzed takes into consideration not only verbal communication but also a type of connection that spans on multiple levels.

As shown by the results the informative event was shown being effective in all the topics taken in consideration, modifying the answers of the participants in a statistically significant manner- even though it’s an evaluation relative only to the short term.

Analysis of the perceptions
For the analysis of the perceptions some questions were administered between the pre-test and post-test. The first query asked to the participants what was their opinion regarding the capacity of a subject of freely getting out of the hypnosis; more then halve of the nurses answered negatively-since a subject under hypnosis can be free of it whenever the patient wishes.

The question that analyzed the perceptions of the nurses in the post-test and looked in to the reason why hypnotic communication in nursing practices. Nurses were given 3 choices out of seven alternatives to choose from. The presence of stereotypes and prejudices was shared among most participants (82.5%) and was considered as the main reason as to why hypnotic communication wasn’t used. Another important reason, according to the participants, was the lack of a proper formation regarding the subject. Also, the lack of a proper university formation was identified as an element as to why hypnotic communication wasn’t used (Fig. 2).

Discussion
The analysis of results in this study allows us to draw important information on which to reflect. The difference of correct answers between pre-test and post-test variations was statistically significant in all of analyzed items, highlighting the effectiveness of the formative event.

The initial analysis of the expertise brought to light by the pre-test is clear: theoretical knowledge on the theme of hypnotic communication is lacking among nursing professionals. From their perceptions it emerges that these gaps are mainly caused by university education and follow up formative experiences.

However, nurses appeared to be sensitive to relational and communicative dynamics tied to hypnotic communication: in the question regarding the relationship between operator and patient (item 3), indeed in the pre-test most nurses already gave a correct answer, recognizing that at the basis of the hypnotic technique there is an intense and constant relational link: such a thing could be reflected that hypnotic communication is partially and unknowingly applied daily in their field of work.

Experiences seem to be influenced by the forms of spectacle of hypnotism, that has nothing to do with the clinical prospective of this technique. The fact that 6 nurses out of 10 consider hypnosis as a state of “altered” consciousness or even “astral”, and believe that it is impossible for the assisted to voluntarily exit the hypnotic state or that in most cases a manner of manipulation, these factors seem to support this hypothesis. But contrary to popular belief no matter the level of hypnosis, it is the person to maintain total control of their conscience and not the hypnotist making it possible to interrupt the hypnosis in any moment. As expressed by Milton Erickson (51) in obtaining the hypnotic state no form of manipulative influence is done by the hypnotist, but this is derived exclusively by conscious and voluntary activity of the assisted.

Analysis of the causes at the root lack use of hypnotic communication within clinical practices opens up certain points of thought. The fact that 8 out of 10 nurses (82.5%) states that the main obstacle is the presence of stereotypes and prejudices shows an elevated level of self-awareness of participants. It is possible that this realization emerged during the training event, in which several misconceptions about hypnotic communication were refuted. Other determining factor is the training done by the participants, and that because of this nursers state that practicing hypnotic communication isn’t possible given the lack of experience and absence of practice. In such a way there is a “gap” of competences, origin of which-according to the nurses participating in the study – is to be found in a continuous education(65.0%) and in university education (38.8%).

Minor but not negligible is the percentage of those that fear possible inter-professional conflicts (28.8%) manifesting perplexity on the effective levels of autonomy for the nurse in the use of this technique. This result suggests that the best strategy for a correct knowledge translation namely a true transfer of these techniques into practice has to start from a proper education and involvement not aimed only for a professional profile but also pointed to develop the competencies of the whole interprofessional team.

The same percentage of participants (28.8%) considers that there is a possibility that there isn’t enough time. It’s important to reflect on this data, since from the start of the hypnotic suggestion it takes at least 3 to 5 minutes before it’s executed: such an element could be caused by preconceptions of the operators.

Lastly, the formative event seems to have contributed in changing perceptions regarding the possible use of hypnotic communication in clinical practices: only 5% of the participants believe that the complexity of these procedures might represent an obstacle, while, for the 6.4% of the sample, it may not have a wide range of uses.

Go to:
Conclusions
Hypnotic communication represents a form of intense relation between assisted and operator, based on the creation of a report of trust, respect and empathy.

The results of this descriptive investigation allow some conclusive reflections regarding the sample of nurses that participated in the study.

Three main elements emerge in the study: the gap of theoretical knowledge among nurses regarding the theme of hypnotic communication; effectiveness of the formative event upon the expertise and the sharing of elements that hinder the implementation of this technique in daily clinical practices. These elements according to the participants are made out of stereotypes and prejudices on the subject and lack of a proper base and post-base education.

Considering the numerous scientific evidences supporting hypnotic communication in a clinical setting and in how it could be implemented (reduction of side effects, reduction of costs and hospitalization time), it is necessary to reflect on the most appropriate strategies to introduce these techniques in care settings. Starting from the consideration of the participants, the first thing to take into consideration is that of generating a culture, acknowledgment and clarity on the theme, with the end of dissolving uncertainty tied to radical prejudices and mistrust regarding hypnosis. Such an action must engage on all systems and levels: from professionals to the sanitary directives given to citizens\patients.

Such a direction could be taken through the activation of formative events, for citizens and operators, including specific formative courses for operators on all levels (university and continuous formation) with the objective of giving the right tools and know-how as to utilize and apply this knowledge to everyday healthcare.

“Relationship time is care time” says the recent Italian Deontological Nurses’s Code (2019) and hypnotic communication can answer this request, since it’s a real and proper helpful communicative tool, pointed to optimizing the potential of the person. This technique allows nurses to “lead hand in hand” the assisted and helping the person in deal with situations that are more complex than the medical issue: pain, fear and the feeling of powerlessness.

Efficacy of hypnotherapy compared to cognitive behavioral therapy for mild to moderate depression – Results of a randomized controlled rater-blind clinical trial

Journal of Affective Disorders
15-6-2021
Source hyperlink

Efficacy of hypnotherapy compared to cognitive behavioral therapy for mild to moderate depression – Results of a randomized controlled rater-blind clinical trial

Summary: In this study, researchers investigated whether hypnotherapy (HT) is as effective as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in treating mild to moderate major depression (MD). The study involved a randomized controlled rater-blind clinical trial with 152 patients diagnosed with MD. Participants were assigned to either CBT or HT, receiving individual psychotherapy over six months. The primary outcome was the percentage improvement in depressive symptoms measured using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The results indicated that HT was non-inferior to CBT in reducing depressive symptoms. Both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses supported this finding. Notably, the study did not include a control group without treatment due to ethical reasons, but the rigorous methodology strengthens the evidence for HT’s efficacy in treating MD.

Hypnosis and Hypnotherapy: Emerging of Science-Based Hypnosis

IntechOpen
13-11-2020
Source hyperlink

Hypnosis and Hypnotherapy: Emerging of Science-Based Hypnosis

Abstract
Hypnosis, which has been used for centuries in different forms, has to be reevaluated in the light of modern medicine and science by biological, psychological, sociological and spiritual approach. Hypnosis has been regaining its popularity in the trend of personalized and holistic medicine without any drug, injection or side effects.

1. Definition
Hypnosis is an agreement of a social interaction between a subject (designated as patient) and the hypnotist (healthcare professional) who suggests imaginative experiences to change sensation, cognition, affect, mood, or behavior in perception, memory, and voluntary control of action. Hypnosis promotes relaxation, enhances imagery to therapeutically recover forgotten incidents.

2. History of hypnosis
In mythology, Hypnos (Somnus, in Latin) is the personification of sleep who lived with his twin brother, Thanatos (Θάνατος, “death personified”) in a dark under world cave on Lemnos island (according to Homer or Book XI of Ovid’s Metamorphoses) without any light from the sun or the moon; where flowed Lethe, the river of forgetfulness. His parents were Nyx (Νύξ, night) and Erebus (darkness), and he married with, Pasithea, the goddess of marriage and birth and the deity of hallucination and relaxation. Their sons called Oneiroi (dreams) were bringers of dreams. Among them Morpheus, brought human dreams; Icelus, animal dreams; and Phantasus, dreams of inanimate things. A bronze head of Hypnos is in British Museum in London (Figure 1). The English word “hypnosis” refers to a person put into a sleep-like state (hypnos “sleep” + −osis “condition”). Hypnosis was used in the temples of Aesculapius, the God of Medicine, where priests advised patients during their sleep as gods talking to them in their dreams. Etymologically speaking, Somnus, Latin word for sleep, is the source of many English words such as insomnia (sleeplessness), somnolent (sleepy), hypersomnia (excessive sleep), and hypnotics(sleep inducing drugs) among many others.

The Marquis de Puységur, who experimented with animal magnetism, put a peasant, into a sleep-like-state, a “sleep of senses,” after which he could not recall his responses to the suggestions during his sleep. A will to direct an organic power unites the magnetizer with the subject. Puységur actually evoked the latent capacity of the subject’s mental and emotional state by paying attention and showing a kind of benevolent love. This was the beginning of hypnosis. Puységur noted significant responses from his subject:

sleep-waking state, that he called “magnetic sleep” or “magnetic somnambulism,” resembled natural sleep-walking condition, rapport, a special connection with the magnetizer, suggestibility, heightened capacity to imagine vividly, amnesia in waking state for the events occurred in the state of magnetic sleep, ability to read the thoughts of the magnetizer, and diagnose the subject’s own illness, change in the personality of the magnetic subject, with increased alertness and self-confidence.

Freud also used hypnosis considering as hysterical reactions to traumatic experiences in childhood and a mobilization of transference phenomena. Hypnotic techniques helped the soldiers to alleviate the effects of traumatic experiences during World War II and treat “traumatic neuroses”.

By second half of the 19th century, Braid coined the term hypnotism and Erickson promoted new approaches to psychotherapy using hypnosis through storytelling.

Abstract
Hypnosis, which has been used for centuries in different forms, has to be reevaluated in the light of modern medicine and science by biological, psychological, sociological and spiritual approach. Hypnosis has been regaining its popularity in the trend of personalized and holistic medicine without any drug, injection or side effects.

Keywords
hypnosisdissociationabsorptionfantasy pronenessimaginative capabilitieseye-movement techniquesexpectanciesimaginative involvementrapportresonance
Author Information
Show +
1. Definition
Hypnosis is an agreement of a social interaction between a subject (designated as patient) and the hypnotist (healthcare professional) who suggests imaginative experiences to change sensation, cognition, affect, mood, or behavior in perception, memory, and voluntary control of action. Hypnosis promotes relaxation, enhances imagery to therapeutically recover forgotten incidents.

Advertisement
2. History of hypnosis
In mythology, Hypnos (Somnus, in Latin) is the personification of sleep who lived with his twin brother, Thanatos (Θάνατος, “death personified”) in a dark under world cave on Lemnos island (according to Homer or Book XI of Ovid’s Metamorphoses) without any light from the sun or the moon; where flowed Lethe, the river of forgetfulness. His parents were Nyx (Νύξ, night) and Erebus (darkness), and he married with, Pasithea, the goddess of marriage and birth and the deity of hallucination and relaxation. Their sons called Oneiroi (dreams) were bringers of dreams. Among them Morpheus, brought human dreams; Icelus, animal dreams; and Phantasus, dreams of inanimate things. A bronze head of Hypnos is in British Museum in London (Figure 1). The English word “hypnosis” refers to a person put into a sleep-like state (hypnos “sleep” + −osis “condition”). Hypnosis was used in the temples of Aesculapius, the God of Medicine, where priests advised patients during their sleep as gods talking to them in their dreams. Etymologically speaking, Somnus, Latin word for sleep, is the source of many English words such as insomnia (sleeplessness), somnolent (sleepy), hypersomnia (excessive sleep), and hypnotics(sleep inducing drugs) among many others.

Figure 1.Hypnos and thanatos carrying the body of sarpedon from the battlefield of Troy. Detail from an Attic white-ground lekythos, ca. 440 BC.
Figure 1.
Hypnos and thanatos carrying the body of sarpedon from the battlefield of Troy. Detail from an Attic white-ground lekythos, ca. 440 BC .
Mesmer, founder of modern hypnosis, considered animal magnetism, an invisible magnetic fluid in all living things, as the cause of illness, which could be treated by manipulating with his hands through hypnosis (Figure 2). Although mesmerism was therapeutically effective, a scientific commission of inquiry attributed the effects of hypnosis to imagination in France in 1784.

Figure 2.Drawing room scene with many people sitting and standing around a large table; a man on a crutch has an iron band wrapped around his ankle; others in the group are holding bands similarly; to the left, a man has hypnotized a woman.
Figure 2.
Drawing room scene with many people sitting and standing around a large table; a man on a crutch has an iron band wrapped around his ankle; others in the group are holding bands similarly; to the left, a man has hypnotized a woman.
The Marquis de Puységur, who experimented with animal magnetism, put a peasant, into a sleep-like-state, a “sleep of senses,” after which he could not recall his responses to the suggestions during his sleep. A will to direct an organic power unites the magnetizer with the subject. Puységur actually evoked the latent capacity of the subject’s mental and emotional state by paying attention and showing a kind of benevolent love. This was the beginning of hypnosis. Puységur noted significant responses from his subject:

sleep-waking state, that he called “magnetic sleep” or “magnetic somnambulism,” resembled natural sleep-walking condition,

rapport, a special connection with the magnetizer,

suggestibility, heightened capacity to imagine vividly,

amnesia in waking state for the events occurred in the state of magnetic sleep,

ability to read the thoughts of the magnetizer, and diagnose the subject’s own illness,

change in the personality of the magnetic subject, with increased alertness and self-confidence.

Freud also used hypnosis considering as hysterical reactions to traumatic experiences in childhood and a mobilization of transference phenomena. Hypnotic techniques helped the soldiers to alleviate the effects of traumatic experiences during World War II and treat “traumatic neuroses”.

By second half of the 19th century, Braid coined the term hypnotism and Erickson promoted new approaches to psychotherapy using hypnosis through storytelling.

3. Neurophysiology and hypnosis
Hypnotic modulation of suffering provokes changes in the anterior cingulate cortex, leaving primary sensory cortex unaffected. Hypnotic modulation of color perception draining or adding color to a stimulus, real or hallucinated, activates the fusiform color area and the inferior temporal region of cerebral cortex with clearer effects in the left cerebral hemisphere than the right. The activation in the left fusiform area is only affected during hypnosis while the right fusiform activation is affected in both hypnotic and control condition. fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) shows heightened activity in the prefrontal cortex. The hypnotized people produce activity in the visual cortex to hallucinate an image. Hypnotic alteration of perception, involves top-down resetting of the intensity of perceptual response, rather than post perception processing changes. There is a decrease in the activity of the dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC) and an increase in connections between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the insula connections between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the default mode network including medial prefrontal and posterior cingulate cortex also weaken).

Hypnotizability is a stable trait and assessed using scales based on the behavioral response of the person in a social context which is correlated with objective physiological responses. Brain activity and plasticity changes in hypnosis measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), positron-emission-tomography (PET) and electroencephalography (EEG) showed that hypnosis inhibits the reaction of the fear circuitry structures. Frontal and cingulate cortices are most linked to hypnotic responding.

Frontal functions have a central role in hypnotic responding. In the first phase of hypnosis, during the induction, the subject’s attention on an object stimulates fronto-limbic structures, which are inhibited and/or dissociated in the second phase. In the third phase, right-sided temporo-posterior regions are stimulated. In response to hypnosis, the fronto-cortical activity is reduced and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex structures are dissociated and the cingulate activity increases or decreases depending on the suggestions. Hypnotic responding demonstrates greater dominance in the right hemisphere than left hemisphere processing, associated with cognitive activities while no difference is found in hypnotizability between left and right hemisphere lesions. Highs have significantly larger rostrum than lows. Hypnosis influences the connectivity between brain regions. The connectivity is decreased between frontal midline areas and left lateral scalp sites in highs while increased between left temporal and right occipital areas in lows. Areas and type of activity changes in the brain depend on the suggestions, rather than hypnosis per se. Highs are more prone to hypnotic suggestions by higher levels of theta activity and structural connectivity between left and right hemisphere frontal areas. Reducing frontal activity increases the response to hypnotic suggestions and not a general hypnotic responsivity.

4. Clinical applications
Hypnosis is performed to relieve pain in abdominal, breast, cardiac, genitourinary and orthopedic surgery. Hypnosis is a powerful means of altering pain, anxiety, and various somatic functions, and recovering forgotten incidents. Hypnosis is found efficient in cancer care even in bone cancer, leukemia, and lymphoma, specifically focused on treatment-induced and conditioned anticipatory nausea/vomiting, pain, anxiety/distress, and hot flashes to manage cancer-related pain, anxiety, fear, lack of appetite. Potential method to manage side effects associated with cancer and cancer treatment.

Patients receiving local anesthetic plus hypnosis experience less anticipatory procedure-related anxiety, and demonstrate less behavioral distress. Hypnosis-based interventions for cancer pain have significant pain reduction, especially when used in combination with other psychosocial-behavioral techniques and supportive-group therapy. Beneficial effects of hypnosis to treat anxiety and distress among cancer patients remained for at least 3 months’ post-intervention, without any adverse effect, relative to an educational intervention controlling the effects of time, therapist attention, and participation from pediatric to geriatric patients, among both sexes. Hypnosis delivered by a therapist is found more effective than self-hypnosis. Self-hypnosis training represents a rapid, cost-effective, nonaddictive, safe and efficacious treatment for anxiety prior to tests, surgery and medical procedures and anxiety-related disorders and psychological disorders such as stress, ego strengthening, unipolar depression, smoking cessation, weight loss, and rehabilitation. The hypnotic intervention is twice less expensive than the standard sedation procedure.

5. Hypnosis associated phenomena
5.1 Suggestion phenomena
Suggestibility,

Hypnotic suggestibility relies on different cognitive processes. Sensory Suggestibility requires the ability to imagine a non-existent, but suggested, sensation. Methods that do not rely on trance, but heighten suggestibility are reflex conditioning, abstract conditioning, repetitive sensory stimulation, use of imagination, and misdirection of attention.

primary suggestibility, direct suggestions for facilitation and inhibition of motor activity,

secondary suggestibility, implied suggestions for sensory/perceptual changes;

tertiary suggestibility, attitude changes in response to persuasive communications;

interrogative suggestibility, occurs following misleading post-event information; or placebo response.

Posthypnotic suggestion: the subject takes the posthypnotic suggestion as a conscious act and continues responding to suggestions delivered in hypnosis even after the termination of hypnosis. The subject can receive and carry out posthypnotic suggestions. Periodic reinforcement makes the posthypnotic suggestions more effective because the behavior is experienced automatically without involvement of executive awareness of this activity.

5.2 Ideosensory response phenomena
Hallucination: “hallucination” is a vivid visual ideosensory response, experiencing something that is not actually happening but feeling as it were happening. Hallucination can be used for aversion therapy, to stop a habit such as smoking, nail biting etc. The person can hallucinate any of the senses. When the subject perceives a specific object that is not actually present in the stimulus environment experience; it is called positive ideosensory response and positive hallucination. If he/she fails to perceive a specific object that is present in the stimulus environment, it is called negative ideosensory response and negative hallucination.

Anesthesia is reduction or loss of any sensory modality, such as blindness, deafness, anosmia, analgesia, or tactile anesthesia. Self -generated pain control can be recreated using hypnotic suggestion for various conditions such as headache and dystonia. Surgery can be performed using only hypnotic anesthesia for pain management without any drug. Not everybody can achieve the depth of trance required for surgical work, but they can become suggestible enough to produce numbness in hand referred as “glove anesthesia,” then “transferred” by touch wherever needed. Numbness of any part of the body can occur spontaneously so profoundly that needles can be inserted into the body without discomfort. If the hypnotist tells to the subject to reduce its perception through sensation of tingling and numbness, with decreased activity of somatosensory dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Hypno-analgesia cannot be reversed by naloxone, an opiate receptor blocker.

5.3 Ideomotor phenomena
Ideomotor responses refer to motor phenomena of muscles responding instantaneously to thoughts and feelings, a movement in response to an idea. The subject moves in response to a suggestion given during hypnosis.

Catalepsy: involuntary tonicity, rigidity or immobility of muscles. It can happen naturally in a fight, flight or freeze state where the body is stuck in place even though the mind tells to move. It can be used in induction/deepening process (with an eye catalepsy/eye lock test) during eyeball catalepsy. Psychogenic sexual issues such as erectile dysfunction or insomniacs who move around too much in their sleep can be relieved by hypnotic catalepsy.

Automatic Writing: “Doodling” is the manifestation of automatic writing and answering to completely different questions without any conscious effort while talking or listening. Then, the subject can interpret what was written in hypnosis.

5.4 Memory phenomena
The hypnotic state of the brain activity is a sort of functional amnesia, a reversible dissociation between implicit and explicit memory (post hypnotic amnesia (PHA)).

Amnesia refers to the act of forgetting. Spontaneously occurred amnesia indicates deep state of hypnosis known as somnambulism. Amnesia is a temporary result of specific hypnotic suggestions.

Somnambulism: deep stage of hypnosis like sleepwalkers’ experience. Hypnotic suggestions become automatic convictions which cannot be recollected by the subject. The hypnotized subject obeys to the directions as awake.

Posthypnotic amnesia, the subject cannot remember events and experiences that he/she lived during hypnosis.

False memory syndrome: Events are processed by the physical brain to become memories accessible by the non-physical mind. A false belief into the mind of another can be instilled.

Cryptomnesia is responsible for past life regression episodes. Invisibly stored information within the brain can be recalled as a result of a stimulus.

Repression: Profound guilt or vulnerability to shame, hate, death, causes to “hide” the event in a time capsule in the mind, so that consciousness is no longer aware of the vulnerability. Repressed memories can lay dormant for years doing nothing for the owner. The conscious mind uses rationalization, as a logical reason for the symptoms associated with the reminiscent event of the original trauma. Repression, a function of the mind’s capacity can be triggered by anything within human experience connected to the repressed memory in forming new instinctive behavior patterns relevant to the living environment. Hypnoanalysis resistance means to abort therapy because of a threat to security felt by the subject. The memory is composed of three separate parts– event, physiological reaction, emotional response. Any one or all three can be repressed.

Hypermnesia (Memory Recall): Experiencing heightened recall abilities during hypnosis is known as hypermnesia. It is the act of remembering more than normal (enhanced recall). Since the material can be inaccurate or false, hypnotically recovered memories are not allowed as “evidence” in court cases. The main use for the phenomena of hypermnesia assists in finding lost items and discovering their locations by remembering past events to attain further details. The hypnotherapist will ask the subject to let the mind drift to the last time that he/she saw the item or places to be with it or handling and to remember and say as much about the item.

Regression: the subject just imagines vividly going back to a past event being aware that he/she is not actually there. It is used for phobias that have started during childhood.

Age Regression (Pseudo revivification): The subject relives previous life experiences as if they happened in present. The subject goes to earlier experiences related to the current problem in a present existence.

Pseudo-regression: Instead of identifying the experiences directly, the subject observes the event from another view as if on a television or movie screen.

Revivification: reliving an incident in the present tense as if the subject was there at that time without current knowledge. Revivification requires deeper state of hypnosis and responsiveness to suggestions and can be experienced in the night dreams. Some regress while some others revivify.

Retrogression (Dynamic Regression): Retrogression is a spontaneous age regression with revivification mixed in.

Age Progression: The subject feels living in the future even though remains in present age. Age progression is a mean to predict how a person would react to an event in the future.

5.5 Perception phenomena
Dissociation: to disintegrate the subject from the painful part of the body to get rid of past traumatic events against fears and phobias. The subject would imagine negative situations. It is like watching a memory on a TV screen rather than seeing through the eyes. The dissociation reduces emotional responses of the subject who would go to a happy place to dissociate from what happens here and now.

Depersonalization: The subject ignores his/her own identity, and acts as another person from a new perspective.

Time distortion: The subjective measuring of time can be altered simply by either enjoying or waiting for something in hypnosis. A person feels expansion of time in boredom. Contraction is the opposite like time flying while having fun. For example, a nervous airplane passenger can start to believe to be on the plane for less time or extend the perceived time of someone on a diet.

Future pacing (mental rehearsal): It is kind of visualization where the subject can prepare himself/herself for success and realization of his/her goals by overcoming the potential obstacles through future options.

6. Theories
A comprehensive theory of hypnosis should cover both cognitive and interpersonal terms. Throughout twentieth century the theories about hypnosis have been between “state” vs. “non-state” theories.

6.1 State theories
Hilgard’s Neodissociation Theory entails a division in consciousness.

6.1.1 Dissociated control theory (DCT)
DCT claims that normally driving habitual behaviors can be influenced outside of conscious awareness without executive control. According to Ego-state theorists, clinicians can promote behavioral change by hypnosis, and have conversations with different ego states.

6.1.2 Dissociated-experience theory
High hypnotizables respond voluntarily dissociated from conscious awareness. The school of Gerald Brassine of Belgium has considered hypnosis not only a question of words nor the result of suggestion, but the product of the use of imagery or memories of the person, having a lot of implicit consequences and practical attitudes in the practice, and being natural product of many different things including choc (trauma) days dreaming and psychotherapeutic hypnosis. The hypnotic relationship would develop more easily if the therapist demonstrates that the patient is the only “ producer” of this state. In such an equal relationship, the hypnotist becomes a facilitator helping the patient to develop a state of trance, but he/she can reject or come out of it anytime if he/she does not want. This comprehension would facilitate a deep state of hypnosis during which the patient feels as “ the boss” of the hypnotic situation, in which he/she does not lose but gains control of his/her emotions and sensations on his/her autonomous nervous system (a psychosomatic control over extremely painful diseases) with the help or assistance of the hypnotist in a cooperative venture. If the therapist understands and acts on this principle at all time, and explains and offers to the patient the knowledge that he/she can produce this phenomenon, the patient would be much more eager to try the proposed possibilities (all classical hypnotic phenomena) and this type of therapist would be much more efficient than any other who just believes that his/her speaking (use of word) and techniques are responsible for the trance of the patient. (It is not far from the Mesmerian conception of animal magnetism or later hypnosis considered as the fruit of the genius suggestions of a therapist). In practice, the emphasis should be on what the patient does and says and not what the therapist says and does.

In the school of Gerald Brassine of Belgium, the thought and practice of PTR (Psychotherapie du Trauma Réassociative) is willing to bring the patient in a state of hypnosis by using what is called utilizational hypnosis. It means that the therapist eases the patient to develop and use a trance state in a constant exchange. This comprehension or conceptualization of hypnosis (the result of the use of memory or imaginative capacities) is building an equalitarian form of relationship in which the patient controls his/her sensations and emotions and the therapist supports and indicates to the patient the possibilities of work while keeping in mind that the patient might probably have better ideas on how to solve his/her difficulties. This is called the production of PAAT (in French: Processus Autonomes Auto-Therapeutiques (more or less in English: Autonomous (Self?) Auto-therapeutic Processes).

Another idea could be the use of the protective dissociations in a concept that implies that the natural apparition of hypnotic phenomena during traumas can be fixed as dissociative reactions turned into symptoms, which can be paradoxically utilized by the therapist to facilitate their eradication as “mental or psychic anesthetics.” Directly derived from the concept that hypnosis is not a result of suggestion, this method brings an incredible opportunity to treat the patients rapidly and comfortably in the situation of extreme sufferings and in the treatment of psychosomatic diseases.

6.1.3 Gruzelier’s neurophysiological theory
High and low hypnotizables are characterized by changes in brain function.

6.2 Non-state theories
6.2.1 Spanos’ socio-cognitive theory
Hypnosis is not an altered state of consciousness. Attitudes, beliefs, imaginings, attributions and expectancies form hypnotic experience and outcome depending of the interpretation of the suggestions without active planning and effort. The sociocognitive behavioral model is used together with contemporary cognitive-behavioral psychotherapies focusing the effects of thoughts, beliefs, and imaginings on behavior and emotion.

6.2.2 Kirsch’s response expectancy theory
Proposes that subjects have generalized response expectancy in a hypnotic situation and follow the hypnotists’s instructions and experience involuntary behaviors attributable to external causes (the hypnotist). Two social factors associated with response to hypnosis: rapport (“therapeutic alliance,” “resonance,” and “harmony,”) and social context are taken in account.

6.3 Integrative/middle-way/neither-one-nor-the-other theories
Cold control theory proposes that the central feature of hypnotic responding is the involuntariness in an actual intentional action.

6.3.1 Brown and Oakley’s integrative cognitive theory
Proposes that involuntariness is an attribute to the causes of behavior and suggestions.

An ability-aptitude model considers two factors as the influencing cause of hypnotic response:

a latent cognitive ability for hypnotic response

the subject’s beliefs about his/her hypnotic response

The social-psychobiological or biopsychosocial model of hypnosis emphasizes the interaction of the hypnotist and the subject, considering their personal characteristics and physiological mechanisms and the contributing role of biological, psychological, and social factors. Hypnotic depth integrates the behavioral aspect (the role of the subject), the phenomenological component (the subjective feeling of trance), and an emotional dimension.

The empathic involvement theory (EIT) of hypnosis proposes a bridging of two incongruent neo dissociative versus socio-cognitive theories of hypnosis. Non-empathic individuals benefit less from hypnosis.

. Scales
Standardized psychological tests such as the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale or the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility (SHSS) measure hypnotizability. The Stanford Profile Scales of Hypnotic Susceptibility (SPSHS), in two forms (I and II), evaluates individual strengths and weaknesses. On the individually administered Stanford Scales, each of 12 test suggestions, scored pass-fail, yield a sum score of hypnotizability on a 0-12 scale. The Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C (SHSS:C), that contains cognitive suggestions including hallucination and age regression, is the gold standard for measuring hypnotizability. The SWASH (Sussex-Waterloo Scale of Hypnotizability) is a 10-item modified Waterloo-Stanford Group C Scale of Hypnotic Suggestibility (WSGC) to reduce screening time and supplement objective scoring. It measures capacity and altering conscious experience. The Dissociative Experiences Scale, a 28-item scale, assesses dissociative experiences. The Tellegen Absorption Scale, a 34-item questionnaire evaluates the capacity of absorption. Dyadic Interactional Harmony questionnaire (DIH) assesses four domains of hypnotist-subject interaction: intimacy, communion, playfulness, and tension. Valencia Scale of Attitudes and Beliefs Toward Hypnosis scale (VSABTH) considers two reliable measures of attitudes, response expectancies and emotional distress toward hypnosis as mediator of hypnotic effects. PCI-HAP (Phenomenology of Consciousness: Inventory-Hypnotic Assessment Procedure) set out to predict hypnotic depth scores.

8. Mechanism
The process of hypnosis consists of a hypnotic induction, a deepening procedure, and symptom-specific suggestions. Hypnosis is a state of highly focused attention, with dissociation of thoughts and sensations toward awareness. It is comprised of three components: absorption, dissociation, and suggestibility. Absorption is full involvement in a perceptual, imaginative or ideational experience for self-altering attention. Dissociation is a mental segregation of components of behavior in a dream-like state of being both actor and observer when re-experiencing autobiographical memories in involuntary motor functions or discontinuities in the sensations of one part of the body compared with another. Suggestibility complies with hypnotic instructions. It is not a loss of will but rather a suspension of judgment due to the absorption and effortless self -loss in what is concentrating on. The hypnotized person does not have control over his/her thoughts and actions and follows the suggestions without looking for alternatives and analyzing their context. The principle of hypnosis is to recall traumatic memories and manage their associated affect and physiological responses by reevaluating their meaning in a new perspective. Hypnosis is a set of techniques to fortify concentration, by decreasing the effect of distractions, and increase to change the subject’s s thoughts, feelings, behavior, or physiological state. Hypnosis is not psychotherapy. Hypnotic perceptual and cognitive changes the equilibrium between suggestion, expectation, and task instructions.

A new non-pharmacological technique called virtual reality hypnosis (VRH), combines VR hardware/software and hypnotic induction. In hypnosis, the subject constitutes his own world by the hypnotist’s suggestions through absorption and dissociation. Virtual reality hypnosis (VRH) does not depend upon the skill of hypnotist and the openness of the subject. The subjects need less imagination and absorption due to visual and auditory stimuli presented in virtual reality
Five psychological factors are most important for the success of hypnosis: hypnotizability, expectancies, motivation, absorptive capacity/fantasy proneness, and attitudes toward hypnosis. The specific type and wording of suggestions influence outcome. Expectancies determine the extent how much the subject believes in the experience and response to the hypnotic intervention. Past experience, current context, and interaction influence expectancies. The collaborative and affective bond between the hypnotist and the subject is the essential component in hypnosis. The subject’s positive response to the contradictory suggestions to his/her previous perception is called countering. Hypnosis is a change in baseline mental activity. Hypnosis like practices inducing trance states have been used throughout history. Medical hypnosis is applying hypnosis to alleviate somatic symptoms, reduce stress, and influence physiological/biochemical processes. The interactional behavioral and affective synchrony between the child and the parent is highly similar to the relationship between the subject and the hypnotist. Synchrony can occur in the behavioral, emotional, phenomenological, and psycho-physiological variables in both the subject and the hypnotist.

In psychoanalytic approach to hypnosis, the hypnotist is similar to an authority figure of the subject from his earlier life experience. Frequently punished children would try not to displease the hypnotist and would show high level of dissociation. Negative parental behavior (punishment and overprotection) is related to the phenomenological and emotional dimensions of hypnotic response leading to higher hypnotizability. Parental behavior of the subject influences hypnotic behavior, experiences, and emotional bond with the hypnotist. A warm- supportive parental style provokes more positive feelings toward the hypnotist, whereas cold-punishing parental behavior is correlated to negative feelings about the hypnotist and hypnosis itself. One consistent pattern in females is that maternal punishment predicts only negative affect in hypnosis, while punishing parental behavior in men, predicts both positive and negative responses to hypnosis. Alexithymia, the decreased ability to identify and verbalize someone’s own emotions, mediates between parental punishment and fear in hypnosis. Therefore, hypnotherapist should search before the hypnotherapeutic intervention the subject’s memories of their parents, which will influence his/her expectations about hypnosis and the hypnotist. Subjects remembering punishing, and/or emotionally unresponsive parents would stay away from the hypnotist even if they know that hypnotherapy would correct the source of the problem. They may feel stress and anxiety in the hypnotic state which can be regulated by the sense of security and mutual trust.

Mindfulness meditation and hypnosis remain in opposing ways to awareness of intentions. Hypnosis and meditation may be combined as a psychosomatic technique to control mind and body regulation. Phenomenology, and neuropsychology of hypnosis and meditation follow common features:

focused attention is the base of induction
an intentional control of biologic-somatic activities
activation/deactivation of the default modality network and pain neuromatrix.

The “mirror neurons” in the human brain provide empathy to sense the intentions of others by observing their behavior and related brain activity. They function as a rapport zone mediating between observing consciousness, the gene expression/protein synthesis cycle, and brain plasticity in hypnotherapy and psychosomatic medicine. (Emerging science recognizes human experience not as disease but as manifestations of individual adaptive self-regulating system) .

Tandem hypnotherapy considers the unity of body and mind as a quantum process, since the embryonic period of life. Tandem has two meanings: (1) a multi-seater bicycle, (2) a mosaic word: Touch of Ancient and New generations with a Dialog Experiencing Oneness of Minds (TANDEM). Hypnotherapy, psychodrama, family therapy, Hellinger’s systemic-phenomenological approach, and holding-therapy are united in Tandem theory. More than two persons in a physical closeness touching each other take part in therapy: (1) patient(s), (2) one or more co-therapists or antagonists in psychodrama. The therapist takes the responsibility of the tandem of patient(s) and co-therapist(s). Sensory-motor level of development is originated from fetal period of life. In uniting mode of experiencing, object and subject are not seen as different from each other. The most effective stimulus is the physical closeness and touching in intimate situation as a form of body psychotherapy. The psychological factors for hypnosis are hypnotizability, expectations, motivation, absorption/imaginative involvement/fantasy proneness, and attitudes toward hypnosis, and a rapport as social factors lead to “resonance” and “harmony”.

Hypnosis and hypnotherapy, which have been experienced for centuries, emerged as new solitary or complementary approach based on science for the wellness of people.

A new treatment for stress which combines mindfulness with hypnotherapy has shown positive results in a Baylor University pilot study

ScienceDaily
15-6-2020
Source hyperlink

A new treatment for stress which combines mindfulness with hypnotherapy has shown positive results in a Baylor University pilot study

Summary: A new treatment for stress which combines mindfulness with hypnotherapy has shown positive results in a Baylor University pilot study. The intervention is called “mindful hypnotherapy.” “Mindfulness is a type of meditation that involves focusing attention on present moment awareness. It can help people cope with stress, but can require months of practice and training,” said researcher Gary Elkins, Ph.D., director of the Mind-Body Medicine Research Laboratory at Baylor University. “Hypnosis also involves focusing attention, but it includes mental imagery, relaxation, and suggestions for symptom reduction.” Hypnosis interventions are typically brief and have been used in pain and symptom management in clinical practice. The study’s basic premise is that using hypnosis to deliver mindfulness goals could have many advantages. “Combining mindfulness and hypnotherapy in a single session is a novel intervention that may be equal to or better than existing treatments, with the advantage of being more time-effective, less daunting, and easier to use,” he said. “This could be a valuable option for treating anxiety and stress reduction.” As a brief intervention, mindful therapy could be widely disseminated and is an innovative new mind-body therapy. The study is published in the International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. Elkins noted that while mindfulness by itself can be an effective treatment for stress and anxiety for some people, it typically is provided in eight weekly sessions that last two hours or more each week and include an all-day retreat of eight or more hours. That amount of time – more than 24 therapy hours – may be a burden in cost and time for some people. Also, research has not shown that mindfulness-based treatments are consistently superior to standard cognitive behavioral therapy. For the study of mindful hypnotherapy, the Baylor research team recruited 42 individuals with self-reported high stress. Half took part in an intervention of one-hour weekly individual sessions that included hypnosis inductions and suggestions for greater mindfulness. Participants also were given self-hypnosis audio recordings lasting about 20 minutes, each with suggestions for a hypnotic induction, relaxation, and greater mindfulness. The second group did not take part in the intervention. Intervention material focused on present-moment awareness, nonjudgmental awareness of the five senses, nonjudgmental awareness of thoughts and feelings, self-hypnosis, compassion for self and others, awareness of personal values and meaning in life, and transition to long-term practice of mindful hypnotherapy.

What hypnosis does to your brain, and how it can improve your health

New Scientist
6-11-2019
Source hyperlink

What hypnosis does to your brain, and how it can improve your health

Summary: Hypnosis, often associated with swinging watches and stage performances, has a rich history riddled with hucksters. However, it holds real benefits, from aiding weight loss to managing pain. Modern medicine is increasingly taking hypnosis seriously. Research is uncovering how it works and its impact on the brain. People are turning to hypnosis for various issues, including anxiety, chronic pain, and hot flushes. While it’s not a cure-all, understanding its mechanisms and learning how to use it effectively can empower us to harness the mind’s power.
This report sheds light on the evolving perception of hypnosis, its applications, and the ongoing scientific exploration of its efficacy. It’s a captivating read for anyone intrigued by the intersection of mind and health.

Hypnotherapy for Smoking Cessation

Cochrane Library
14-06-2019
Source hyperlink

Hypnotherapy for Smoking Cessation

Summary: Hypnotherapy is widely promoted as a method for aiding smoking cessation. It is intended to act on underlying impulses to weaken the desire to smoke or strengthen the will to stop. In a review conducted by Joanne Barnes and colleagues, hypnotherapy interventions were found to be as effective as other forms of behavioral support six months after treatment. While hypnotherapy helped people quit, it was unclear whether it was any more beneficial than other approaches

British Psychological Society Report on Hypnosis

Medium
29-8-2018
Source hyperlink

British Psychological Society Report on Hypnosis

As a Chartered Psychologist and member of the British Psychological Society (BPS), I was very interested to stumble across a review of hypnosis by the BPS.

The review was led by the renowned psychologist Professor Michael Heap and other experts. It was published in 2001, shortly after I started practicing hypnotherapy in London. The findings of the report are very interesting and I quote in full below the section on the effectiveness of hypnotherapy for anxiety and many other conditions:

“Applications of hypnosis in therapy and evidence of its effectiveness Although accounts of the clinical applications of hypnosis have been published in books and journals over the last 150 years or so, it is only in the last 30 years that serious attempts have been made to evaluate the outcome of hypnotic procedures in groups of patients with specific problems. In such studies, hypnotic procedures have constituted the main component of treatment and have typically been directly targeted at symptom alleviation.

Enough studies have now accumulated to suggest that the inclusion of hypnotic procedures may be beneficial in the management and treatment of a wide range of conditions and problems encountered in the practice of medicine, psychiatry and psychotherapy. In many cases, however, the relative contribution of factors specific to hypnosis is as yet unclear, and often the influence on outcome of the measured hypnotic susceptibility of the patients is small or insignificant.

The results of clinical research may be summarised as follows: There is convincing evidence that hypnotic procedures are effective in the management and relief of both acute and chronic pain and in assisting in the alleviation of pain, discomfort and distress due to medical and dental procedures (Blankfield, 1991; Genuis, 1995; Lang, Benotsch et al., 2000; Lang, Joyce et al.,1996; Montgomery, DuHamel & Redd, 2000; Walker et al., 1991) and childbirth (Brann & Guzvica, 1987; Freeman et al., 1986; Jenkins & Pritchard, 1993).

Hypnosis and the practice of self-hypnosis may significantly reduce general anxiety, tension and stress in a manner similar to other relaxation and self-regulation procedures (Schoenberger, 2000). Likewise, hypnotic treatment may assist in insomnia in the same way as other relaxation methods (Anderson, Dalton & Basker, 1979; Stanton, 1989).

There is encouraging evidence demonstrating the beneficial effects of hypnotherapeutic procedures in alleviating the symptoms of a range of complaints that fall under the heading ‘psychosomatic illness’. These include tension headaches and migraine (Alladin, 1988; Holroyd & Penzien, 1990; ter Kuile et al., 1994); asthma (see review of clinical studies by Hackman, Stern & Gershwin, 2000); gastro-intestinal complaints such as irritable bowel syndrome (Galovski & Blanchard, 1998; Harvey et al., 1989; Whorwell, Prior, & Colgan, 1987; Whorwell, Prior & Faragher, 1984); warts (DuBreuil & Spanos, 1993); and possibly other skin complaints such as eczema, psoriasis and urticaria (Shertzer & Lookingbill, 1987; Stewart & Thomas, 1995; Zachariae et al., 1996).

Hypnosis is probably at least as effective as other common methods of helping people to stop smoking (see review by Green & Lynn, 2000). Meta-analyses by Law & Tang (1995) and Viswesvaran & Schmidt (1992) give mean abstinence rates for hypnosis at 23 per cent and 36 per cent respectively. There is evidence from several studies that its inclusion in a weight reduction programme may significantly enhance outcome (Bolocofsky, Spinler & Coulthard-Morris, 1985; Kirsch, Montgomery & Sapirstein, 1995; Levitt, 1993).

There have been fewer studies specifically on children, but the available evidence suggests that the above conclusions may be extended to children and young people (Hackman, Stern, & Gershwin, 2000; Sokel et al., 1993; Stewart & Thomas, 1995; see also review by Milling & Costantino, 2000).

Too few studies have been published investigating the adjunctive use of hypnosis in broader psychotherapeutic programmes for the treatment of specific psychological disorders such as depression, sexual dysfunction and disorder, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, speech and language disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder and phobic disorders. A similar statement may be made concerning its use in sports psychology.

The above conclusions are provisional, as research on the clinical effectiveness of hypnosis is continuing with improved Methodology” (Heap et al 2001, pp. 9–10).

As can be seen, the report is very favourable regarding the effectiveness of hypnotherapy. The report also suggests that more research is needed, which is a sentiment I fully support. It is only through research that we can identify the best strategies and approaches for applying hypnosis to treating various conditions.

Hypnosis Intervention Effects on Sleep Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
15-02-2018
Source hyperlink

Hypnosis Intervention Effects on Sleep Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Summary:

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Sleep improvement is a promising target for preventing and modifying many health problems. Hypnosis is considered a cost-effective and safe intervention with reported benefits for multiple health conditions. There is a growing body of research assessing the efficacy of hypnosis for various health conditions in which sleep was targeted as a primary or secondary outcome. This review aimed to investigate the effects of hypnosis interventions on sleep, to describe the hypnotic procedures, and to evaluate potential adverse effects of hypnosis.
METHODS: We reviewed studies (prior to January 2017) using hypnosis in adults for sleep problems and other conditions comorbid with sleep problems, with at least one sleep outcome measure. Randomized controlled trials and other prospective studies were included.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine nonduplicate abstracts were screened, and 24 of the reviewed papers were included for qualitative analysis. Overall, 58.3% of the included studies reported hypnosis benefit on sleep outcomes, with 12.5% reporting mixed results, and 29.2% reporting no hypnosis benefit; when only studies with lower risk of bias were reviewed the patterns were similar. Hypnosis intervention procedures were summarized and incidence of adverse experiences assessed.
CONCLUSIONS: Hypnosis for sleep problems is a promising treatment that merits further investigation. Available evidence suggests low incidence of adverse events. The current evidence is limited because of few studies assessing populations with sleep complaints, small samples, and low methodological quality of the included studies. Our review points out some beneficial hypnosis effects on sleep but more high-quality studies on this topic are warranted.