The British Psychological Society
03-2001
Source hyperlink

The Nature of Hypnosis – A report prepared by a Working Party at the request of The Professional Affairs Board of The British Psychological Society

Summary: The report highlights an important ruling by France’s highest court, the Cour de Cassation, deeming evidence collected from witnesses under hypnosis as inadmissible in court proceedings. The article features the views of hypnotherapist Alban de Jong, who criticizes the court’s decision, emphasizing the significance of his hypnotherapy work in providing crucial evidence for solving puzzling cases. De Jong provides examples where his work under hypnosis led to vital breakthroughs in criminal investigations, thereby questioning the court’s dismissal of hypnosis evidence. The article also presents the perspective of the court and provides specific case examples, showcasing the debate surrounding the utilization of hypnosis in legal proceedings.